Characterization of occult hepatitis B virus from blood donors carrying genotype A2 or genotype D strains.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in blood donations identified occult HBV infection (OBI) as a potential threat to blood safety. METHODS: A collaborative study was undertaken to explore the molecular basis of OBIs prevalent in Europe in relation to clinical and serological data. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of 77 donor samples of European origin HBV DNA positive but HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative were confirmed. Viral load ranged between unquantifiable and 5640 IU/mL (median 25 IU/mL). Fifty-two strains were genotyped (14 HBV(A2) and 38 HBV(D)). Compared to HBsAg+ samples, genotype D was significantly more frequent than genotype A2 in OBIs from Poland or Italy (P<0.04). Amino acid substitutions were concentrated in the immunologically active parts of the Pre-S/S proteins (P<0.0001) affecting both cellular CD8 T-cell epitopes and B-cell neutralizing Major Hydrophilic Region epitopes. Substitutions were more frequent in OBIs than in HBsAg+ strains of both genotype D (P<0.001) and A2 (P<0.01), in OBIs of genotype D than A2 in the 'a' region (P<0.001) but not cellular epitopes, and in anti-HBs+ than anti-HBs- OBIs (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the hypothesis that humoral and cellular immune pressure on the HBV envelope proteins are major mechanisms generating OBI.

Italian blood donors with anti-HBc and occult hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection might allow the release of viremic units into the blood supply network if blood is tested only for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The aim of our study was to evaluate the actual prevalence, viral load and genotype of occult HBV infections among first-time blood donors in north-western Italy and to suggest a way to minimize risks of transmission of this infection. DESIGN AND METHODS: We assayed 6313 consecutive blood donors for antibodies to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) in addition to mandatory screening. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive donors were assayed for antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and for HBV-DNA using COBAS Ampliscreen HBV (Roche) on individual donations. All HBV-DNA-positive samples underwent confirmatory testing with additional polymerase chain reaction-based assays. RESULTS: The prevalence of anti-HBc positive subjects was 4.85%. Fourteen out of 288 blood donors (4.86%) were confirmed to have circulating HBV-DNA at a low level (range 8-108 IU/mL). All viremic donors were also anti-HBs-positive. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that in north-western Italy up to 2298 units per million donated units from first-time donors may contain HBV-DNA. The risk of an HBV-DNA positive unit from an occult carrier being released into the blood supply is more than 100 times higher than the estimated residual risk related to the window phase of HBV infection in our country. The potential infectivity of these units is debated, but their use cannot be considered safe at least in immunocompromised patients.